I had my biggest parental fail yet last week. I was in the process of unbuckling my son out of his high chair when I got distracted and turned my head. When I turned back, he’d tumbled forward and taken a spill. He and I were both pretty shaken up by the whole experience, but he’s on the mend and will be just fine.
In the days following, I’ve been a little paranoid and extra careful. But I wonder: had I left him in that dangerous position before? It could be that this was the first lapse I’d had and it turned out poorly, or it could be that I’d made this mistake before and gotten lucky because nothing bad had happened.
I don’t have a nanny cam running in my home 24-7 to monitor my parental performance, so I can’t really know the answer to that question. But if I did, this accident might not have happened. There’s a benefit to being able to review your performance, even if the end result turned out just fine.
Let’s carry that lesson over to the test prep world. Sure, it makes sense to spend most of your review time going over problems you missed so that you’re better able to understand what went wrong and how you can do better next time. However, it does make sense to spend some time going over the questions you get correct as well. At minimum it can reinforce good habits, and potentially you may spot mistakes that didn’t end up costing you a correct answer on this problem. However, you may not be so lucky next time.
For instance, if asked for the square root of 9, and given an answer choice of 3 you won’t be penalized for forgetting that -3 was also an option. However, if you review that correct answer and realize your mistake you’re less likely to make the same mistake where your error is the difference between a right answer and a wrong one.
As I’ve seen this week it’s helpful to learn from a wrong choice, but it’s even better if you can learn without suffering the consequences.
The positive numbers m and p are variables in the following equation:
4m + 5mp + 10 = 50m
What is p in terms of m?
A) 46/5 m
B) 9m + 5
C) 46/5 – 2/m
D) 5/m + 2
E) m/5 + 46
There’s always going to be an algebraic solution to this problem, but this one is… a little ugly. The solution doesn’t come out neatly, so there’s a fair amount of potential to make a mistake or lose confidence as you’re working through it. I hope you respond to that by saying, “Don’t worry! I see variables in the answer choices, so I can just plug in my own numbers!” That’s a wonderful thought, but here is how that might go wrong if you try it.
“Well, I know I’m supposed to pick numbers that are easy to calculate, so let me just use m = 2 and p = 3. If we plug those in to our original equation we get:
4(2) + 5(2)(3) + 10 = 50(2)
8 + 30 +10 = 100
48 = 100
When plugging in your own numbers into a problem, it’s important to know that your numbers need to follow the rules set up in the problem. But don’t worry, that doesn’t mean you need to magically pick a pair of numbers that works out of the air. Notice, in this case we don’t see both variables in the answer choices, only m. So, let’s pick a value for m, plug that into the equation and see what value it spits out for p.
4(2) + 5(2)p + 10 = 50(2)
8 + 10p + 10 = 100
10p = 82
p = 41/5
So now we have a pair of numbers that works for this equation. We know that when m=2, p=41/5. Now we can just test that pair against our answer choices to see which equation gives us the value of p that we found.
A) 46/5 m; 92/5… Nope
B) 9m + 5; 23… Nope
C) 46/5 – 2/m; 41/5… YES
D) 5/m + 2; 9/2… Nope
E) m/5 + 46; 232/5… Nope
Plugging in numbers can be a valuable strategy, but make sure you’re using it correctly!
The internet can be used for good or evil. Today it’s being used to point out the evil that the Union Street Guest House is trying to impose on its customers. The USGH imposes a $500 fine on wedding parties when one of the guests posts a negative review about the hotel. It’s a terrible policy that has encouraged the vigilantes of the internet to bombard the hotel’s Yelp page with one-star negative reviews.
This isn’t the only place you’ll find an obsession with ratings and reviews. In nearly every car dealership experience I’ve had over the past two years, I’ve been sent a survey afterward asking for my feedback. However, along with that survey has been an instruction (sometimes verbal, sometimes written) that on the 1-10 rating scale, 10 is considered excellent and 9 is considered poor.
In the USGH example, their policy of fining guests for negative reviews makes the positive reviews suspect, and gets rid of the opportunity for the hotel to get feedback on how to improve the experience for their guests. In the car dealership example, the dealership asks for feedback, but only if it’s positive, which skews the data they get and prevents them from getting honest… feedback.
The lesson here is that scores are feedback. Treat them honestly. When you take a practice test and receive a bad score, don’t find the excuses. Don’t look at how late your were up the night before or bemoan the fact that the guy across the table at the library was breathing loudly, use it as feedback and motivation to improve.
In the same way, don’t get so obsessed and hung up on a number that you lose sight of the real goal. The USGH’s goal is presumably to give their guests a good enough experience that word gets out and they can sell rooms consistently every night. A four-star Yelp review may have been good enough to achieve that goal. Because they sought to do everything possible to work toward a five-star review, they ended up with a rating that at this writing is hovering around 1.5 stars. If your goal is to get into a part-time MBA program at the local university, you may not need to obsess about the GMAT. A minimal, focused amount of practice may do. Keep the big goals in mind rather than getting caught up with the number.
And never… EVER… mess with the internet.
“In a sport where a percent of players have a body fat percentage below b, c times out of d a randomly selected player will be above the threshold for obesity.”
How many times did you have to read that until it made sense? Two? Three? More? Try this version:
“In a sport where 50 percent of players have a body fat percentage below 15, 1 time out of 3 a randomly selected player will be above the threshold for obesity.”
Much easier to understand, right? All we did is define those variables as you can see from a quick chart:
a = 50
b = 15
c = 1
d = 3
The difference in the readability of those two sentences should tell you a lot about the usefulness of picking numbers. When you have answer choices that are written in terms of variables, such as “(ad/c) +b” rather than trying to parse exactly what that means it’s much easier to plug in your variables (50*3/1 +15) and see if that matches what you need it to. If it does, you’ve likely come across the correct equation.
Those who love pure equations often scoff at this approach and need to see the logic behind every equation. However, in a timed, multiple choice test you simply don’t have the luxury of going deep into every single problem. And the reality of the situation is that a deep understanding isn’t rewarded any more than a lucky guess. All that matters are correct answers.
So, the next time you notice variables in your answer choices, or are struggling to understand what’s going on through all the variables, try assigning values and see how much it helps!